A few weeks ago I had the opportunity to speak on a panel at an event hosted by Bloomberg. It was fun! Here was the info about the event.
Bloomberg Speaker Series: Artificial Intelligence in Finance
Bloomberg invites you to join us for our 2nd Data Speaker Series Event. Our Speaker Series is a more intimate forum where we will discuss trending topics after working hours. Our goal for sponsoring these events is to gather a community of market leading practitioners to have a chance to network and share best practices.
Bloomberg kicked off the Data Speaker Series in February with a very engaging discussion regarding alternative data usage in the investment process. The goal of the May event is to have industry experts across investing and academia discuss AI & Machine Learning tools and applications in finance. Featured speakers include leaders from Citadel, Neuberger Berman, Blackstone and NYU.
Time and Location:
Wed, May 16, 2018, 6pm-7:30pm
Bloomberg Enterprise, 120 Park Avenue (41st and Park)
6:00 PM – Registration & Networking
6:30 PM – Panel Discussion
7:30 PM – Networking Reception
- Lisa Schirf, COO, Data Strategies Group and AI Research, Citadel
- Michael Recce, Chief Data Scientist, Neuberger Berman
- Jeff Sternberg, Data Science Engineering, Blackstone
- Dr. Anasse Bari, Ph.D., Professor of Computer Science, New York University
- Ashish Singal, Senior Product Manager, Artificial Intelligence, Bloomberg
- Jeremy Baksht, Global Head of Alternative Data, Bloomberg
Discussion Topics – AI in Finance:
- What are the unique challenges applying AI to financial markets?
- How is AI actually being used today both sell side and buy side in trading / investing?
- In terms of culture / people, how do we bridge the gap? Do researchers understand markets and do traders understand technology?
- What kind of models specifically hold the most promise and for which use cases?
- How will AI help unlock value in unstructured data?
Here I am pontificating about how “data is an asset class”. Deep!
so much depends
a big excel
saved with linked
beside the sad
Thanks to Mr. Robot, finance pros, and Not So Standard Deviations.
Like many companies, mine uses an HTTP proxy to protect us from various security risks, such as malware, unintended data leaks, and the like. In general this is a great thing. I heard from one of our risk engineers that malware incidents went down substantially when they implemented this proxy.
However, as a developer trying to code behind this proxy, it’s a constant battle. I recently found develop-behind-proxy, which is a very good resource for this. In particular, knowing how to configure the tools you’re using is super important. There doesn’t seem to be very much agreement out there in how to configure tools to route http/https traffic through the proxy, especially when any kind of proxy authentication is involved.
The things I’ve tried have included:
- setting HTTP_PROXY, HTTPS_PROXY, and similar environment variables
- setting the lower case version of these vars (are some tools case-sensitive? I think so…)
- putting my username and password in the proxy URL (e.g. http://user:firstname.lastname@example.org:8080)
- URL encoding my username and password
- since this is a windows environment, adding the domain and a backslash before my username
- setting these in various places, like the windows user environment variables, Cmder‘s user-profile.cmd file, the .bash_profile inside the little Ubuntu VM I set up since some apps are either not available or break in weird ways in the windows shell
Of course I haven’t taken detailed notes so I’m not sure which config works for each tool! That’s on me though.
Oh, I’ve also tried Cntlm, and it has a nice little way to encrypt your username and password so that you can feel a little better about putting your credentials in a config file. But so far it hasn’t seemed to really help that much. The key thing I can’t quite figure out with it is how to reference it running as a Windows service from inside the Ubuntu VM.
The frustrating thing about this is that I get the feeling that all of this energy I’m spending configuring the proxy is taking away brain power and time from my “real work”.
But maybe not? Perhaps part of being a coder in a corporate setting is fighting the proxy? Perhaps we should put this in our job postings?
I just started a new job, and finished my first week. I’m working with people I’ve worked with before. However it’s been about 6 years since we worked together, so it’s a interesting mix of familiar and new, both culturally and technically.
Culturally, processes are very open and there are lots of discussions, both hallway chats and meetings. Of course everyone has these, but the thing that sticks out in this culture is that generally the content is “real”. Meaning it’s focused on topics that are highly relevant to the work being done on the team. Things like who’s going to work on what? Why is this approach better? What are we actually going to do next? There’s very little tolerance of high-level hand-wavy atmospherics. Business-speak is rarely used and often scoffed at. I like it.
Being an engineer, I’m probably more interested in how the tech stack is both familiar and new. The familiar parts are the application architecture (mostly 3-tier) and the programming framework (.NET). The new parts are that there is more automation in general, and more rigorous security practices.
An even new part of the stack is so new it doesn’t exist yet, because I am here to build it! That is, we want to build a data science stack, including all the big data stuff that entails. In short, to “bring in data science”.
Should be fun!